Choose an episode in the history of science that Khun would classify as a scientific revolution (the Copernican
revolution, chemical revolution, Darwinian revolution, revolutions in physics, etc.) and evaluate the evidence
more carefully to determine how well these episodes support Kuhn’s model. Do you find that this episode provides
evidence for Kuhn’s theory of the development of science? Does this episode support a firm distinction between
normal science and revolutionary science? Are there really universally accepted theories (paradigms)? Could it be
that Kuhn has imposed a structure on the development of science that isn’t really there?
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!