project managament

Hi there can you please open the file attcahment and follow the assignment brief very cerfully and see whats talking about please thanks .

BSS010- 3: Project Management
Assessment 1D: End Project Review Report (INDIVIDUAL)
(Instructions: Use the marking criteria below as your guide for this assignment. Word count: 2,500 words; Submission date: Wednesday, 30th April 2014; Time: 11:59 PM)
Marking Criteria
Review of Project Objectives (20%)
– What were the planned objectives (From Project Report)
– Compare the planned objectives to the actual results?
– What were the differences between the plan and actual?
– Why were the differences between your planned objectives and your actual achievements (use theory to explain your answer)
Review of Lessons Learnt from the Project (25%)
? What have you learned as a result of doing this project?
? You may have learned that there are some things that you did that you would not do again if you were to work on another project.
? You may have learned new ways of approaching activities within a project that you would replicate in other projects.
? Any lessons learned are valuable ? whether they are based on good or bad experiences they are very useful for future reference.
? Give details of any recommendations for action in relation to this project:
? What would you like to happen as a result of this project ? what recommendations would you make as a result of undertaking this project? Can you suggest new ways of approaching future 3rd year projects as a result of the outcomes of the project?
? Give details of any recommendations for action in relation to future projects in general:
? You may, as a result of experience on this project, have a number of recommendations to be taken forward in future projects. These recommendations may, for example, relate to the whole project approach, or the way in which project teams are established and trained. The recommendations can be made as a result of both positive and negative experiences within the project journey but, again, whatever the experience the recommendations for future projects are likely to be valuable.
Considers what you have Learnt about Working in a Group. (20%)
– How did you feel about working in a group?
– What was the impact of other people on your learning?
– What was the most successful part of the experience?
– What would you do differently in future groups?
Reflection on Individual Learning (25%)
– What did you contribute the most?
– What skills, abilities or knowledge did you use?
– What skills, abilities or knowledge did you gain from the project (or the course)? For example:
– Hard skills such as Project Management Tools and Techniques
– Soft skills such as Group-working or Leadership Skills?
– How will you update your resume to show these skills, abilities and knowledge
Quality of Report Presentation (10%)
– Business Report Format (including Executive Summary, Introduction)
– Well presented. Good ?Readability (e.g. use of short paragraphs and sentences + use of headings and diagrams or tables)
– Well expressed + grammar/spelling
Assignment 1D Marking Grid
Criteria
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
Review of Project Objectives (20%)
Nothing Submitted related to project objectives.
Work of limited merit? A limited set of objectives may be given and/or results given. No attempt is made to compare these.
A limited set of objectives are given and a weak attempt is made to compare these with what was actually achieved. No attempt was made to explain differences and no appropriate theory was used.
A limited set of objectives are given and a weak attempt is made to compare these with what was actually achieved. The differences were not explained well and no appropriate theory was used.
A satisfactory set of objectives are given and these are compared with what was actually achieved. Some differences are explained but weak use made of appropriate theory.
A good set of objectives are given and these are compared well with what was actually achieved. Any differences are explained well but better use could have been made of appropriate theory.
A strong set of objectives are given and these are compared well with what was actually achieved with good explanations given. Any differences are explained well using appropriate theory.
Review of Lessons Learnt from the Project (25%)
Nothing Submitted related to review of lessons learnt from the project.
Work of limited merit ? any lessons learnt or recommendations given are not appropriate.
Any lessons learnt or recommendations given are weak and not explained well.
At least one appropriate lesson learnt is explained or at least one suitable recommendation for future projects is given.
A few lessons learnt and a few recommendations for future projects are given. However, several of these are not explained and/or justified well.
Several insightful lessons learnt and several strong recommendations for future projects are given. However, not all of them are explained and/or justified well.
Several insightful lessons learnt are explained and several strong recommendations for future projects are justified.
Criteria
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
Reflection on what you have Learnt about Working in a Group (20%)
Nothing Submitted related to group work experiences.
No entries of any merit in this area. Reflection could have been done on the following: 1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations 2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion 3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups.
Minimal reflection on group work issues. Better reflection could have been done on the following:
1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations
2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion
3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups
Some description on group work experiences ? enough for a pass. Better reflection could have been done on the following:
1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations
2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion
3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups
Satisfactory reflection on Group work and considers at least 1 of the listed criteria items, although not strongly:
1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations
2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion
3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups
Good reflection on Group work and considered the following, one of them very well: 1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations 2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion 3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups
Excellent reflection on Group work and considered the following, at least 2 of them very well:
1. Appraisal of your own and others? motivation in the light of a range of theoretical perspectives of how people behave in groups and organisations
2. Consideration of interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating and persuasion
3. Consideration of the concepts of group dynamics and team roles as applied to working in small groups
Criteria
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
Reflection on Individual Learning (25%)
Nothing Submitted related to individual learning.
No entries of any merit in this area. Reflection could have been done wrt. what was learnt about the following:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
Student describes in limited detail what they have learnt wrt. at least one of:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
– However, no real reflection on their strengths and weaknesses in these areas or how they could be improved.
Student describes well what they have learnt wrt. at least one of:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
– However, no real reflection on their strengths and weaknesses in these areas or how they could be improved.
Student describes well what they have learnt wrt. at least two of:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
– However, only limited reflection on their strengths and weaknesses in these areas or how they could be improved or updated in their CV (resume).
Student describes well what they have learnt wrt. at least two of:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
– Some good reflection on their strengths and weaknesses in these areas or how they could be improved or updated in their CV (resume).
Student describes well what they have learnt wrt.:
? ?Hard? skills such as Prince 2 and Project Management tools and techniques
? ?Soft? skills such as Group-working or Leadership. Transferrable skills such as presenting or research
– Some very good reflection on their strengths and weaknesses in these areas or how they could be improved or updated in their CV (resume).
Criteria
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
Quality of Report Presentation (10%)
Business Report Format not followed
Unacceptable presentation ? untidy, missing sections, incorrect order of sections, missing contents page etc
Poor attempt made to follow a Business Report Format.
Unsatisfactory presentation of work, with some serious errors in grammar, spelling and overall clarity of document. Difficult to read/follow.
At least one of Executive Summary, Introduction or Conclusions sections done. Business report format of writing followed.
Reasonable presentation of work, but with several errors in spelling/grammar affecting readability.
At least two of Executive Summary, Introduction or Conclusions sections done. Business report format of writing followed.
Good presentation of work, with some grammar and spelling mistakes, but not significantly affecting readability.
Executive Summary, Introduction and Conclusions sections all done but one of these may be weak. Business report format of writing followed.
Very good presentation of work with the odd minor spelling or grammar mistake. Consistent style kept in the document and readability good.
Executive Summary, Introduction and Conclusions sections all done well. Business report format of writing followed.
Excellent presentation of work. Good grammar, no spelling mistakes. Well expressed and good readability
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂