Environmental studies

Environmental studies

How might a researchers position shape the processes and outcomes of their research (Use an example from your own discipline/programme to illustrate your answer)? Is reflexivity a sufficient protection against the risks of positionality?

Project description
– Saldaña-Portillo, Josefina. (2001) Who’s the Indian in Aztlán? Re-writing mestizaje,
indianism, and chicanoism from the Lacandón. In, Ileana Rodriguéz (ed.), The Latin
American Subaltern Studies Reader.
USA: The Duke University Press, pp. 402-423.
– Bazan, Cristina. 2004. La ciudad de México vista a través de la presencia indígena. In,
Patricio Navia and Marc Zimmerman (eds.), Las ciudades Latinoamericanas en el
Nuevo [des]Orden Mundial. México: Siglo Veintiuno, pp. 386-402.
– Crossa, Veronica. 2009. Resisting the entrepreneurial city: street vendors’ struggle in
Mexico City’s Historic Center. International Journal of Urban and Regional
Research 33, 43-63.
– Sundberg, Juanita. 2003. Masculinist Epistemologies and the Politics of Fieldwork in
Latin Americanist Geography. The Professional Geographer 55, 180-190.
– Bondi, Liz. 1997. In whose words: on gender identities, knowledge and writing
practices. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22, 245-258.
– Hartsock, Nancy. 1987. Rethinking modernism: minority vs. majority theories.
Cultural Critique 7, 187-206.
– Moss, Pamela. 1995. Embeddedness in practice, numbers in context: the politics of
knowing and doing. Professional Geographer 46, 54-66.
– Nast, Heidi. 1994. Women in the field: critical feminist methodologies and theoretical
perspectives. Professional Geographer 47, 442-449.
– Rose, Gillian. 1997. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other
tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21, 305-320.
– McDowell, Linda. 1992. Doing gender: feminism, feminists and research methods in
human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17, 399-416.
– Turner, Sarah. 2010. Challenges and dilemmas: fieldwork with upland minorities in
socialist Vietnam, Laos and southwest China. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 51, 121-134.
– Herod, Andy. 1999. Reflections on interviewing foreign elites: praxis, positionality,
validity, and the cult of the insider. Geoforum 30, 313-327.
– Rice, Gareth. 2010. Reflections on interviewing elites. Area 42, 70-75.
– Butz, David and Besio, Kathryn. 2004. The value of autoethnography for field
research in transcultural settings. The Professional Geographer 56, 350-360.
– Massey, Doreen with the Collective .1999. Issues and debates. In, Doreen Massey,
John Allen and Paul Sarre (eds.), Human Geography Today. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 3-
21.
– Mullings, Beverley. 1999. Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of
interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30, 337-350.
– Moustakas, C. (1994) Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
– Moustakas, C. (1990) Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology and Applications.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

 

 

© 2020 customphdthesis.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.