Describe and compare the economies of the UAE and France

Describe and compare the economies of the UAE and France
Project description
A. Content:
1. Briefly describe the two economies in broad terms – this serves as part of the
introduction to the assignment and as a basis for motivating your choice of
variables. Hint: remember that France is part of the EU; the UAE is part of the
GCC.
2. Variables: identify and justify relevant variables – i.e. use relevant theory to
justify your choice of variables. Hint: you might start from the macroeconomic
identity: Y=C+I+G+(X-M) or any other models

3. Data: researching and collating appropriate and comparable ten year data (The
WDI databank should be used as the primary database for your assignment”http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators”, this
should be supported by data from other sites (e.g. Eurostat, Zawya, National Bureau of
Statistics) to address any gaps in the data. Up-to-date data is necessary to gain a good
grade )

4. Explanation: researching qualitative/analytical explanatory material (e.g. EIU
country analyses, IMF reports, etc.) to explain the data presented in section A2.

B. Analysis
1. Explaining: giving reasons why economic variables have values you found.
2. Linking: relating variables to broader indicators such as the standard of living,
economic growth prospects, etc. (data analysis).
3. Difference: comparing data and explanations for two economies, and drawing
conclusions as to any reasons for observed differences (comparative analysis).
4. Future: using data and explanations to suggest likely future development paths
(trend analysis).

C. Presentation
1. Data: presenting data in simple, clear, comparable and relevant terms using
appropriate graphical means where possible. ( at least 8 graphs should be presented ( column, line, pi-chart.. etc)
2. Comparison: combining data and commentary into single, clear and coherent
comparison. Note: only include key graphs and tables in the report itself –
delegate related supporting material to an appendix
3. Writing: quality of written expression.
4. Citation: adequacy and correctness of citation of sources. Note: this assumes that
all citations are appropriately provided, and relates to the quality of the citations.
N.B. Failure to appropriately cite quantitative or qualitative material may lead to a
separate penalty mark.

Indicators

As an indication of the nature of grading, general criteria for the factors listed above are
given in the table below:

A1. Introduction
Comprehensive and
cohesive, draws on
relevant demographic,
geographic, political
environment to give
clear introduction to
the economies.

A2. Variables
Very relevant
variables, linked in
analysis.

A3. Data
Quality data, fully
comparable.

A4. Explanation
Variety of quality/
critical sources.

B1. Explaining
Logical analysis of
causes for data
outcomes.

B2. Linking
Variables related
together and to broad
macro indicators.

B3. Differences
Differences used to
generate further
insights on variables.

B4. Future
Projections based on
country’s trajectory
and underlying factors.

C1. Data
Data presented
consistently and fully
comparably using
graphical means to
best advantage.

C2. Comparison
Integrating data and
commentary into
seamless comparison.

C3. Writing
‘An interesting read’ –
writing conveys
relevant information i

C4. Citations
Complete and correct.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂