Caser Study Report

Prepare a comprehensive report on a publicly traded company listed on the Company Index at the end of the textbook -based on the

guidelines provided in Chapter 13. Company cases from the Dess text will be selected and assigned during the first workshop. This

project allows the individual to employ strategic methods, tools, and techniques to identify section level strategies and develop

specific implementation plans. It is expected a comprehensive report between 18 to 25 pages. You will be asked, as assignments, to

submit parts of the case study for initial feedback and grading. The following is a suggested outline: I have selected Topic please

look at attached copies and enhance and improve what has already been written This is a MBA course and need to reflect thast in my

paper

Introduction
SWOT Analysis
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
Analysis of the Competition (at least tow major competitors)
Business or Corporate-Level Strategies used by the Company
Recommended plans of action
Financial estimates (see financial reports and publicly available annual reports)
Recommended plan of implementation
Conclusion (based on the analysis)

Note: Conclusion will include the paragraph of Biblical and ethical integration from each interim report.
Rubric
Title:
MGMT 5803 Individual Case Study Paper
MGMT 5803 Individual Case Study Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Flagged question e2565888dd introduction/conclusion
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

The paper has a well developed introduction and conclusion.
4 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

The paper has an introduction and conclusion but there is room to further develop,
3 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

The paper has only an introduction or conclusion but not both. There is room for improvement.
2 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Paper is missing a good introduction and does not draw any conclusion.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
4 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd • Analysis of the organization’s strategy, managerial policies and practices.
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

The paper makes strong use of tools such as Porters Five Forces Model, SWOT analysis, and Financial Analysis to evaluate the case.
10 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

The paper uses some but not all of tools such as Porters Five Forces Model, SWOT analysis, and Financial Analysis to evaluate the case.

There is room for improvement in the analysis.
8 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

The paper makes weak use of the toolssuch as Porters Five Forces Model, SWOT analysis, and Financial Analysis to evaluate the case.

There is significant room for improvement in the analysis.
4 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Analysis of the strategy, policies, and practices are missing.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
10 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd Recommendations for potential improvement
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

Strong recommendations for improvement. Well thought out and explained.
5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Some recommendations for improvement made. There is room to strengthen this section a bit in the paper.
4 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

Weak recommendations for improvement made. There is significant room for improvement here.
2 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

No recommendations were made for improvement. This required section of the paper was not addressed.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
5 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd APA Format
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

The paper followed APA style formatting.
1 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

The paper failed to follow APA style formatting.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
1 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd Grammar and Punctuation
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

There were no grammatical or punctuation errors in the paper.
3 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

There were a few grammatical or punctuation issues with the paper.
2 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

There were several grammatical or punctuation issues with the paper.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
3 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd Professional Presentation
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

There were no typos, spelling, etc. within the paper.
1 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

There were typos, spelling errors, etc. within the paper.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating

pts
1 pts
—
Additional Comments

Flagged question e2565888dd Flow of Paper
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
Topic:
Ethical Integrity of the Corporate Houses- A Misnomer: Case Study of Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is amongst the leading financial service providers in U.S. that serves to a highly diverse set of high-net-

worth clients. It deals with the global investment banking issues securities and investment management and its clientele base comprises

the various financial institutions, the public and private corporations, government agencies as well as the individuals. It was founded

in the year 1869 and its present headquarters are located in the city of New York (www.goldmansachs.com). The firm owes more than 40

offices dispersed in different financial centers of the globe. The tagline of the firm says ‘Our client’s interest always comes first’

but as one explores the conduct of the firm over the last decade, particularly around the time of 2008 recession, the statement proves

to be a complete marketing oxymoron.
The evidences suggest that the firm indulged in an utmost disgusting unethical behavior; it sold the clients useless financial products

by yielding them fake promissory advices, initiated a sequence of irresponsible mortgaging among Americans and made them lose their

money (www.imf.org). On the other hand it made enormous gains serving their own vested interests of corrupt officials and their greed.

However things are changing in recent times as the firm is making deliberate effort to restore the faith of its clients and take social

responsibility initiatives (www.goldmansachs.com). It is essential for the firms to remember that the core of business ethics is

regarding the attainment of excellence and not malfeasance.

References
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrel, L. (2009). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases: 2009 Update. CengageBrain. com.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.

Cambridge University Press.
Retrieved from< http://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship-and-sustainability/environmental-markets/index.html

(Links to an external site.)>
Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10265.pdf (Links to
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!