+1 862 207 3288 Save Link
Assignment Clinical Field Experience C: Adjusting Instruction to Address State and District Test Results
View Rubric
Details:
Allocate at least 3 hours in the field to support this assignment.
Observe and collaborate with your mentor teacher about the following aspects of assessment, testing, and differentiated instruction:
1. How is instruction adjusted according to state and district test results? How is professional development adjusted according to state and district test results?
2. Explain how instruction is differentiated based on state and district test results.
3. How is technology integrated to administer the tests?
4. How are test results delivered to families?
5. Considering laws of assessments in respect to IEPs etc., how are accommodations provided, delivered, and included in the analysis of state and district test results?
6. What types of assessments/strategies are used to prepare for state and district tests?
Using any remaining field experience hours, assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.
Consider your discussion and collaboration with your mentor teacher. Write a 250-500 word reflection describing how your mentor teacher analyzes and adapts instruction based on assessment results. Why is this practice vital in meeting the needs of all students? Be sure to reflect upon how you will use these findings in your future professional practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
RUBRIC
Clinical Field Experience C: Adjusting Instruction to Address State and District Test Results
1
No Submission
0.00% 2
Insufficient
69.00% 3
Approaching
74.00% 4
Acceptable
87.00% 5
Target
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
15.0 %Adjusting Instructing and Professional Development Not addressed. Reflection does not describe how instruction and professional development are adjusted according to state and district test results. Reflection inadequately describes how instruction and professional development are adjusted according to state and district test results. Reflection clearly describes how instruction and professional development are adjusted according to state and district test results. Reflection skillfully and concisely describes how instruction and professional development are adjusted according to state and district test results.
15.0 %Differentiated Instruction Based on Results Not addressed. Reflection does not explain how instruction is differentiated based on test results. Reflection inadequately explains how instruction is differentiated based on test results. Reflection clearly explains how instruction is differentiated based on test results. Reflection skillfully and concisely explains how instruction is differentiated based on test results.
15.0 %Technology Integrated to Prepare and Administer Results Not addressed. Reflection does explain how technology is integrated to prepare and administer results. Reflection inadequately explains how technology is integrated to prepare and administer results. Reflection clearly explains how technology is integrated to prepare and administer results. Reflection skillfully and concisely explains how technology is integrated to prepare and administer results.
15.0 %Test Results Delivered to Families Not addressed. Reflection does describe how test results are delivered to families. Reflection inadequately describes how test results are delivered to families. Reflection clearly describes how test results are delivered to families. Reflection skillfully and concisely describes how test results are delivered to families.
15.0 %Accommodations Provided, Delivered, and Included in Results Analysis Not addressed. Reflection does not explain how accommodations are provided, delivered, and included in results analysis. Reflection inadequately explains how accommodations are provided, delivered, and included in results analysis. Reflection clearly explains how accommodations are provided, delivered, and included in results analysis. Reflection skillfully and concisely explains how accommodations are provided, delivered, and included in results analysis.
10.0 %Types of Assessments and Strategies Not addressed. Reflection does not discuss types of assessments and strategies used to prepare for state and district tests. Reflection inadequately discusses types of assessments and strategies used to prepare for state and district tests. Reflection clearly discusses types of assessments and strategies used to prepare for state and district tests. Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses types of assessments and strategies used to prepare for state and district tests.
10.0 %Conclusion Not addressed. Reflection does not address why it is vital to adapt instruction based on assessment results. Conclusion does not reflect upon how this information will be used in future professional practice. Reflection inadequately addresses why it is vital to adapt instruction based on assessment results. Conclusion weakly reflects upon how this information will be used in future professional practice. Reflection clearly addresses why it is vital to adapt instruction based on assessment results. Conclusion strongly reflects upon how this information will be used in future professional practice. Reflection thoroughly addressees why it is vital to adapt instruction based on assessment results. Conclusion skillfully and concisely reflects upon how this information will be used in future professional practice.
5.0 %Mechanics Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
100 %Total Weightage
