Applying standerdized terminlogies in Practice Order Description For a selected patient scenario, identify related NANDA, NIC, and NOC elements. Describe in detail the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom that guided you. The scenario is one that you choose and is in a context familiar to you so that you can provide the detail requested and apply your learning from this point forward. Applying Standardized Terminologies in Practice Guidelines With Scoring Rubric Purpose This assignment is designed to help students • apply standardized terminologies; and • develop an appreciation of the relationship between standardized terminologies and the data-information-knowledge-wisdom continuum. Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the following ability. (CO 4) Assess the value of standardized terminologies in supporting nursing in all four practice settings. (POs 5, 11) Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3. Total Points Possible: 200 Requirements For a selected patient scenario, identify related NANDA, NIC, and NOC elements. Describe in detail the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom that guided you. The scenario is one that you choose and is in a context familiar to you so that you can provide the detail requested and apply your learning from this point forward. PREPARING THE PAPER 1. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings. 2. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition. 3. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is 3–5 pages in length. 4. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly. 5. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing. Category Points % Description Introduction 45 22.5 Introduction presents a brief overview of the scenario and of the parts of the paper. NANDA, NIC, and NOC Elements 45 22.5 Clearly identifies related NANDA, NIC, and NOC elements. Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom 45 22.5 Describes in detail the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom that guided you. Conclusion 45 22.5 Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. APA Style 6 3 Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. Citations 7 3.5 Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. Writing Mechanics 7 3.5 Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, and page restrictions are met. Total 200 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria A (100–92%) Outstanding or highest level of performance B (91–84%) Very good or high level of performance C (83–76%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance F (75–0%) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance Content Possible Points = 180 Points Introduction 45–42 Points 41–38 Points 37–34 Points 33–0 Points Introduction presents a brief overview of the scenario and names the key parts of the paper. Introduction presents one of the two required elements. Introduction does not include either of the two required elements. No introduction is present. NANDA, NIC, and NOC Elements 45–42 Points 41–38 Points 37–34 Points 33–0 Points NANDA, NIC, and NOC elements are clearly identified for a selected patient scenario. Only two of the three elements are clearly identified. Only one of the three elements is identified. Elements are not provided. Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom 45–42 Points 41–38 Points 37–34 Points 33–0 Points Provides a detailed description of the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom that provided guidance through the selected scenario with support from scholarly literature. Provides a partial description of the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom that provided guidance through the selected scenario. DIKW are discussed but not analyzed. There are major gaps in the identification/analysis of DIKW. Conclusion 45–42 Points 41–38 Points 37–34 Points 33–0 Points Provides a summary of key points of the paper as well as insights gained during the assignment. Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. Concluding statements are present but do not address insights. Concluding statements are not evident. Content Subtotal _____of 180 Points Format Possible Points = 20 Points APA Style 6 Points 5 Points 4 Points 3–0 Points 0–3 APA format errors in text, title page, and references. 4–6 APA format errors in text, title page, and references. 7–9 APA format errors in text, title page, or references. 10 or more APA format errors in text, title page, or references. Citations 7 Points 6 Points 5 Points 4–0 Points 0–3 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. 4–6 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. 7–9 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. 10 or more errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. Writing Mechanics 7 Points 6 Points 5 Points 4–0 Points 0–3 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing AND page limits are met. 4–6 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing AND page limits are met. 7–9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing OR page limits are not met. 10 or more errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. Format Subtotal _____of 20 Points Total Points ____of 200 Points PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)v

Management

Order Description

Paper requirements:

Must be on an article relating to Managing/Management or Teamwork/Working in Teams.

This is the following assignment expecatations:

Section 1: The Paper’s Theoretical Development and Contribution

In this section you should constructively critique the theory development of the

paper. Some questions that you may reflect on include:

? How well does the paper summarise a matter of conjecture or debate in the

relevant academic literature?

? Does the paper provide an adequate summary of the literature to date?

(Here, you might like to provide a couple of references to relevant papers

that the authors have not included in their paper).

? Does the paper bring together a new understanding of managerial

phenomena that has not been put forward by other authors (i.e. is there

something novel and original in the paper)?

Section 2: The Paper’s Development of Empirical Evidence

The progression of science (including social sciences like management) is

based upon the analysis of evidence. Good academic work will assemble and

analyse evidence with great care. For the evidence to be useful it should have

some wider applicability (i.e. it should provide generalisable results) and the

study should be able to be replicated by another researcher. You can choose a

qualitative (case based) or quantitative (numbers based) paper, but a knowledge

of statistics is not a pre-requirement for this course and critiquing statistical

methodology should not become a major focus of your review. Some questions

that you might reflect on for this section include:

? If the paper is based on case evidence, is the case a useful one for this

research? Is the case unusual in such a way that the evidence is highly

specific to the case and not relevant elsewhere?

? If the paper is based on quantitative data (for example from a survey) are you

confident that the survey has been well administered and is representative of

the population under analysis?

? Have the researcher(s) taken care in assembling evidence? Are you

confident that they have asked the right questions to the best respondents in

the organisation/industry under investigation?

? If the case is based on secondary data (for example, an analysis of

newspaper articles or other secondary materials) might there be some

systematic biases present in the dataset (for example, SMEs are not as well

reported as large firms)?

? Is the case study material or quantitative data analysed appropriately and

well? Is the analysis something a journalist would do, or does it follow good

academic processes?

Section 3: The Paper’s Contribution to Better Managerial Practice

In this section, you should assess the importance and relevance of the paper’s

contribution to the improvement of managerial practice. Some questions that you

might reflect on for this section include:

? What contribution to better managerial practice and/or better organisational

and social outcomes does the paper provide?

? What is interesting about the paper that is important for management,

organisations and society?

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

© 2020 customphdthesis.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.