If any liberal discussion of autonomy were to take place, it may be helpful to distinguish between two complementary aspects of autonomy – namely, non-perfectionist and perfectionist autonomy.
Non-perfectionist autonomy holds that autonomy is a right to make certain personal decisions free from unwarranted outsider interference. There are two main types of argument for this position: the Kantian argument – proposing that individuals exist as ends in themselves because they possess a rational will, and the Utilitarian arguments – grounded in an ideal of the permanent interests of man as a progressive being (Mill, 1989, p.14).
Perfectionist autonomy occurs when the individual exists free from unnecessary affectations of innermost desires. Perfectionist autonomy also has two relative arguments: the Kantian sense of autonomy considers individuals to be autonomous insofar as they a…(short extract)