Prepare a case law summary of the authority below.

Prepare a case law summary of the authority below.

Order Description

Prepare a case law summary of the authority below.
“Groener v Minister for Education and the City of Dublin Vocational Educational Committee(379/87) [1989] ECR 3967”.

Elements that you may want to consider including in addition to the three basic elements are:
(a) Dicta (commentary about the decision that was not the basis for the decision)

(b) Dissent (if a valuable dissenting opinion exits, the dissent’s opinion)

(c) Party’s Arguments (each party’s opposing argument concerning the ultimate issue)

In addition to these elements, it may help you to organize your thoughts, as some people do, by dividing Facts into separate elements:
(1) Facts of the case (what actually happened, the controversy)

(2) Procedural History (what events within the court system led to the present case)

(3) Judgment (what the court actually decided)

EXTRACTING THE RELEVANT INFORMATION: ANNOTATING AND HIGHLIGHTING (important)

Annotating Cases

Highlighting
Why highlight? Like annotating, highlighting may seem unimportant if you create thorough, well-constructed briefs, but highlighting directly helps you to brief. It makes cases, especially the more complicated ones, easy to digest, review and use to extract information.
Highlighting takes advantage of colors to provide a uniquely effective method for reviewing and referencing a case.

The basic sections of a case for which you should consider giving a different color are:
?1- Facts
?2- Procedural History
?3- Issue (and questions presented)
?4- Holding (and conclusions)
?5- Analysis (rationale)
?6- Other Considerations (such as dicta)

please make sure to write all above information.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

© 2020 customphdthesis.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.