Literature review and evaluation of your progress

Literature review and evaluation of your progress
To be submitted by: 2014 [online]

Learning Outcomes

Learning outcome K1
Be able to select, specify and plan an appropriate project relevant to the needs of an organisation

Learning outcome K2
Undertake the project to the agreed specification, plan and timescale

Learning outcome S1
Justify proposed actions/solutions, underpinned by appropriate research

 

Student Name (PRINT):

I certify that this piece of assessment is my own work, that it has not been copied from elsewhere, and that any extracts from books, papers, the internet or other sources have been properly acknowledged as references or quotations
Student Signature: Date:

Print Name and Sign Date
Assessor
Internal Moderator
Cross-Moderator

 
Feedback comments to students:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Mark (%)

 

Comments from moderators:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Literature review and evaluation of your progress – 2000 words
This should be a literature review on all the secondary research you have done for your project, based on your project proposal [assignment 1] and the feedback, and an evaluation of the progress you have made on your project so far.

You must include:

• A literature review covering all the secondary research you will find for this assignment used for your project Question below in read.
• Reflection – an evaluation of your progress

You should place your project title in context by carrying out a review of a selection of published works on related topics you will research in this assignment . The literature review should discuss how the project relates to theory and to wider reading that you have done on the topic based on your project title .
PROJECT TITLE : “the advantages of using a store card as in the my Waitrose card?

And what are the cost benefits of a customer loyalty scheme for store cards “

 

 

You must use the Harvard Referencing System. Failure to do so will result in lost marks.

This assignment makes up 20% of the final grade for this module.

All assignments MUST be completed.

 

Additional information for students in completing assignment 2:

• Students will be expected to abide by a word count of 2000 words
• Students must include a word count at the end of the assignment
READ BELOW FOR SPECIFIED GRADE CRITERIA ON Pg 5 :

UG Assessment & Grading Criteria for UHBS Coursework (Report) Assignment 2: Progress and Literature Review

Module Code:_______________________________ Lecturer:________________________________ Student: ________________________________________

REPORT
Presentation & structure Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing
Evaluation of progress Business Application & Integration of Data/Literature Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection Any other lecturer instructions
Task details
Follows report structure & keeps to word limit of 2000 words. Follows Harvard style for in-text citation & Reference List – Use a minimum of … sources; clearly written and presented Content included – progress on achieving objectives so far and minimum of 4 blogs to support planning process [to be placed in Appendix]. [Note: This includes 10 marks offered for blogs and full attendance.] Selection of sources for literature review: appropriate and relevant. Show a wide range of background research. Evaluation of sources: critical review:
Sources relate to the topic
/marks /10 Marks /10 Marks / 30 Marks /25 Marks /25 Marks Lecturer comments:
70-79

Excellent Excellent … Presentation & report structure, with numbered paragraphs, list of contents/figures, appendices & cross referencing.
Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only a minor error. Excellent… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Excellent … Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated.
Evidence of appropriate reading.
Covers all relevant points & issues. Excellent … Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.
Excellent… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection clearly developing points in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of all possibilities.

60-69

Very Good Very good… Presentation & report structure, paragraphing, use of numbering, list of contents/figures, appendices & cross referencing.
Fluent academic writing style.
Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes. Very good… Standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system.
Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list. Very good… Level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated.
Covers most relevant points & issues.
Few errors / omissions in content/calculations. Very good… Business insight & application.
Breadth, depth & integration of literature/data into work.
Very good… Level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection & a few ideas/points could benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂