Describe the art of rhetoric as espoused by Aristotle and his intellectual followers identify and explain

(with examples and possibly from other theoretical traditions/approaches) at least three reasons
conceptualizing how such arts might help policy makers in their analyses, and three reasons
conceptualizing how it might hinder policy analysis. Conclude the paper with a description of your
own position on the role of advocacy in policy analyses.
Assessment criteria
– Demonstrated understanding of the tradition of rhetoric and the elements that are part of it.
– Ability to write clearly and in a well-structured way
– Ability to connect the rhetorical tradition and its ?lens? to the activities of policy
makers/analysts/administrators as demonstrated by use of examples and academic literature
which highlight the contribution of rhetoric/advocacy to policy analysis.
– The relevance and breadth of use of literature from both the course material BUT also from
other academic sources promoting or critiquing the use of rhetoric – – The ability to engage the interest of the reader
– The application of academic conventions for citation and list of references at the conclusion of
your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂