Critically evaluate the theoretical foundations of organizational learning in the light of innovative collaboration for value creation

1.Explain and apply critiques of a range of management theories and their impact on contemporary settings

2.Critically appraise interactions between different management standpoints

3.Evaluate the contribution that a range of ideas have imparted on management practice.

4.Identify and evaluate a range of practices from within a variety of contexts which are exemplars of management theory

5.Evaluate the contribution that a range of ideas have imparted on management practice.

6.It is expected that the Reference List will contain twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and four academic books.

7.Make sure the reference are cited in Harvard Style.

Critically evaluate the theoretical foundations

Assessment
LO1:  Explain and apply critiques of a range of management theories and their impact on contemporary settings
Assessment 1+2
LO2:  Critically appraise interactions between different management standpoints
Assessment 1 +2
LO3: Evaluate the contribution that a range of ideas have imparted on management practice.
Assessment 1+2
LO4: Identify and evaluate a range of practices from within a variety of contexts which are exemplars of management theory
Assessment 1
LO5: Evaluate the contribution that a range of ideas have imparted on management practice.    Assessment  1+2

Assignment Brief:
Secondary Research Level HE6 – It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and four academic books.

.

Specific Assessment Criteria:
First class: This piece of work shows evidence of wider research with reference to a number of differing academic viewpoints. The essay has recognised relevantly and discussed in detail, all the required external environmental factors which affect the management operation of mega events.  Several reasoned and logical arguments have been developed well and supported by a wide range of appropriately researched literature. Reference to two or more academic viewpoints/models is clear, relevant and informative. Presentation is of a high standard, and in the appropriate essay style.  The high number of appropriate sources has been referenced accurately and to a high standard. Examples are provided

Second class: A clear and informative piece of work with evidence of wider research and discussion. The essay has correctly recognised and discussed, all the required external environmental factors which affect the management operation of mega events.  Some reasoned arguments have been developed and supported by a good number of sources.  Reference to two academic viewpoints/models is clear.  Presentation is of a good standard, in the appropriate essay style.  A good number of appropriate sources have been referenced well, with most complying with the Harvard style. Examples are provided

Third class: A reasonable attempt has been made at researching the essay but greater in depth discussion and academic debate is required.  The essay has recognised the external environmental factors which affect the management operation of mega events, however mostly the discussion is superficial and lacking in any depth.  Reference to two academic viewpoints/models has been attempted.  Presentation of the essay is limited, and only the minimum of 5 sources has been provided, with at least one academic text and two academic journals included.  Examples are few.

Fail: Students who do not meet the requirements of a third class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.

Please also see General Assessment criteria for HE6.

Submission Instructions:
See Section 10 Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of written coursework, which will give you details on how to submit your work electronically.  You are required to submit only electronic copies of your written assessments, unless your Module Tutor advises you otherwise.

Advice:

•    Do not cut and paste phrases or paragraphs from published sources. You should seek to use your own words to explain concepts and theory.

•    If you wish to refer to specific quotes from published sources then you must use full Harvard presentation. See BISSTO for clear guidance.

•    Do not share work with other students.

© 2020 customphdthesis.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.