Communication-What can we do about Hailey

You are expected to prepare a report that discusses the components of a reward system and recommends a progressive approach to the practice of reward management. You will be expected to justify your r

Introduction to Communication-What can we do about Hailey?

Project description
Study the scenario and write answers to the questions at the end. Assessment Brief: Human Resource Management
Module Code and Title   IML6102 Human Resource Management
Module Tutor   Nobert Osemeke
Tutor with responsibility for this assessment   Nobert Osemeke
(Element Number), Weighting, Type and Size of Assessment   002: 50% Coursework:
2000 words
(This essay will allow candidates to demonstrate their understanding of the module content and also their ability to work independently )
Submission deadline   August 25th 2014, Monday, End of Day (11.59 PM)
Arrangements for submission   Submit the assignment on Moodle strictly as per deadline
Date and location for return of work   August 25th 2014, Monday, End of Day (11.59 PM)
To be submitted on Moodle
Disabled students   Alternative assessment arrangements will be available for disabled students

Assessment Requirements

‘US fast-food workers strike over low wages in nationwide protests’.*

When this news appeared in the Guardian newspaper in Dec. 2013, it caught the attention of the CEO of an up and coming UK based fast-food organisation who had been aiming to emulate McDonalds’ business strategy of cost leadership for gaining a market share in the UK. In view of this development, the CEO appoints you as a consultant. The aim of this appointment is use your experience and expertise in reward management to develop a progressive reward system that mitigates the risk of avoiding similar industrial action. You are expected to prepare a report that discusses the components of a reward system and recommends a progressive approach to the practice of reward management. You will be expected to justify your recommendations.

*Source: Gabbatt A (2013), The Guardian [Online] available at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/05/fast-food-workers-strike-minimum-wage

Max 2000 words
The essay should demonstrate the planning, research, analytical and decision making abilities of the student. You are expected to refer to your core text and other credible academic sources. The focus should be on discussing all dimensions of reward management and the importance of having a reward strategy that is well integrated with business strategy and organisational objectives.

Special Instructions
The word count (excluding referencing) should not exceed 2000 words excluding references.

Guidelines: Format: 12” Times New Roman, Justified, Single Space. The report should have a ToC and a footer with page numbers.

Essential Source
Armstrong M (2012) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice Twelfth Ed., Kogan Page

Other Texts:
 Huczynski, A A and Buchanan D A (2007) Organisational Behaviour 6th Ed. Harlow, FT Prentice Hall
 Torrington D; Taylor S; Hall L and Atkinson C (2011) Human Resource Management 8th ed. Financial Times/ Prentice Hall

Expectation: Critical analysis that cites at least 5-6 good quality academic resources including CIPD online resources.

Note on References
Harvard Referencing. It is important to reference sources in accordance with the referencing conventions recommended for the course. These conventions apply to information taken from Internet sources, books and journals and also lecture notes.
Assessment Criteria
The essay will be marked on the following criteria:
•   Content
•   Application of theory
•   Structure /Presentation
•   Evidence of research
•   Relevant sources and accurate referencing (bibliography)

Classification
% Range   Content   Application of theory   Structure / Presentation   Evidence of Research   Referencing
Outstanding   80-100   Excellent portrayal and discussion of key issues and ideas supported with adequate analysis   Thorough knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts   Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling   Evidence l of required level of research    Correct referencing and bibliography
Excellent   70-79   Thorough portrayal of key issues and material with some discussion   Appropriate knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts    Good presentation competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling   Evidence of some research from supplementary sources   Appropriate referencing and bibliography
Good Quality   60-69   Accurate description of main issues and material only   Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts   Logical presentation, appropriately structured and with satisfactory grammar and spelling   Evidence of directed research only

Adequate referencing and bibliography
Acceptable   50-59   Description of main issues and material only   Rudimentary knowledge of key principles and concepts   Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling   Little evidence of research    Correct but limited referencing
Adequate   40-49
Limited description of main issues and material only
Limited and/or inconsistent knowledge of key principles and concepts
Weak presentation and structure and not an appropriate level of grammar and spelling
Minimal evidence of research only
Limited and not completely correct referencing
Fail (Marginal)   <40
Insufficient for the level
Little evidence of knowledge of key principles and concepts
Poor presentation, grammar and spelling
Little or no evidence of research
Little or no referencing

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂