meta-analysis publication

Paper details:

This exam covers Ch. 7, 9 and 10. Question CC- 9.
Review the requirements for proper APA formatting of citations and Reference Lists. You may take parts of the MU Tutorial over again, if you wish. The APA Manual is also available in the Reference Section of our Library.
If you are uncertain about the definition of a meta-analysis publication or a publication that incorporates multiple studies into its design, please check the definitions. It may also help you to read the textbook Appendix: Research in Organizational Behavior.
I have altered the questions somewhat from the textbook version. Please print out this Instruction sheet and keep it nearby when answering the questions. Attention to detail will avoid losing credit for failure to follow directions or straying off-target in your answer.

Please copy the questions exacting as written and any parenthetical information into your paper. It should precede your answer. If there are sub-sections then copy a single sub-section and respond to it and repeat the process until you have completed all sub-sections.
Minimum: 2 paragraphs per sub-section.
Case I: Managing Motivation in a Difficult Economy.
Question CC-9. [10 pts]
Claussen essentially designed the program on his own, with very little research into goal-setting and motivation.
a) Which parts of the program appear to fit well with research evidence [from MU academic databases within the last 5 years] on goal-setting?[ You must find a minimum of one meta-analysis or a single multiple-study designed article.]
b) Which parts of the program would you change to get more substantive improvements in employee motivation? [Be sure to explain your reasoning and evidence from the textbook, in addition to your conclusions.]

PLUS

Case III: Building a Coalition
{You may choose one of the following questions to answer. Either question is worth 10 pts.}
Question CC-17
The development team will be more effective if members have some idea about how groups and teams typically operate. Review [in detail] the dominant perspectives on TEAM [not group] formation and performance from the research and theory presented in the textbook for the committee so it can know what to expect. [All parts of the answer should be in full sentences, not bullets.]
OR
Question CC-18
Given the profiles of candidates for the development team, provide detailed suggestions for who would likely be a good group member and who might be less effective in this situation. Be sure you are using the relevant research on groups and teams in the textbook to defend your choices. [You may also add your own reasoning.]

ADDITIONAL FORMATTING:
12 pt font
One inch margins all around
Single spaced paragraphs. One space between paragraphs.
APA format
No clip art or bullets

please use the book “Organizational behavior 16th edition”

Question CC-9. [10 pts]
Claussen essentially designed the program on his own, with very little research into goal-setting and motivation.
a) Which parts of the program appear to fit well with research evidence [from MU academic databases within the last 5 years] on goal-setting?[ You must find a minimum of one meta-analysis or a single multiple-study designed article.]

b) Which parts of the program would you change to get more substantive improvements in employee motivation? [Be sure to explain your reasoning and evidence from the textbook, in addition to your conclusions.]

Case III: Building a Coalition
Question CC-17
The development team will be more effective if members have some idea about how groups and teams typically operate. Review [in detail] the dominant perspectives on TEAM [not group] formation and performance from the research and theory presented in the textbook for the committee so it can know what to expect.

A team is a group of different people who joins together to achieve the team’s goal. Many evidences suggest that team formation and performance are both important in determining the success of the team in terms of existing as a unit. Its formation should be based on an objective criteria, wherein members are chosen based on their contribution to the team in terms of skill set and ability to co-exist with others. For example, a band is created as a group of people who creates music together. A band member thus needs to know how to play an instrument or sing. The manager is not included in the band, even if he is one of the members’ best friends or he is the one who promotes the group, because he does not make the music with the other members. Meanwhile, for a team that has different objectives as it goes, the team is formed with a core of able people, and then is extended based on the skills set and the preliminary results of the team’s activities (Milojevic, 2013). Aside from having the skill relevant to the team, the team member must also be open to share his ideas with others and to listen to what others have to say. If one of the members is dissenting and unhappy, he leaves, and is replaced with someone more amenable to what the group wants to do. Once formed, the team must be able to share ideas on how to achieve the team’s goals. It has been shown that an initial personal meeting is more helpful than a virtual one. A structured team building increases the productivity of the team (Park, Campbell and Barton, 2014).

Milojevic, S. (2013).Principles of scientific team formation and evolution.PNAS,111(11), 3984-3989.

Park, R., Campbell, & Barton (2014).Setting the stage for virtual team development: designing teams to foster knowledge sharing.ACAD MANAGE PROC, Meeting Abstract Supplement, pp. 17244