Darkness too visible

The topic is a Darkness Too Visible. Should the paper have a Rhetorical Analysis. Should the essay have to answers this questions below. you don’t have to answer all

the question, but most of them.
The Kairotic moment and writes motivating occasion:
1-) What motivated the writer to produce this piece?
2-) What social, cultural, political, legal, or economic conversations does this argument join?

Rhetorical context: Writers purpose and audience:
1-) What is the writers purpose?
2-) Who is the intended audience?
3-) What assumptions, values, or beliefs would readers have to hold to find this argument persuasive?
4-) How well does the text suit its particular audience and purpose?

Rhetorical context: Writes identity and angle of vision:
1-) What is emphasized and what is omitted in this text?
2-) How much does the writers angle of vision dominate the text?

Pathos of the argument:
1-) How effective is the writer in using audience-based reasons?
2-)How does the writer use concrete language, word choice, narrative, example, and analogies to tap readers emotions, values, and imaginations?

Overall persuasiveness of the argument:
1-) What features of this argument contribute most to making it persuasive or not persuasive for its target audience and for you yourself?
2-) How would this argument be received by different audiences?
3-) What features contribute to the rhetorical complexity of this arguments?
4-) What is particularly memorable, disturbing, or problematic about this argument?
5-) What does this argument contribute to its kairotic moment and the argumentative controversy of which it is a part?

the link of the article be use is below:

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303657404576357622592697038

thank you …

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂