basic assumptions of normative ethical theories

Paper instructions:
Arguments consist of one or more premises and a conclusion. It is usual to apply some basic assumptions of normative ethical theories as premises in ethical argumentation.

Consider the following ethical problem:

We had our co-op apartment treated for bedbugs. When we informed the co-op board, they said it was up to us whether to alert our neighbors. The management company advised us not to, for fear of spreading panic. I want to give our neighbors a chance to be on the lookout, but I don’t want to scare them unnecessarily or alienate them with bad news. Should I tell?

Reconstruct this problem as an argument. What are premises and conclusion of this argument? Add to the premises of this argument a principle of contractarianism. How would such a contractarian premise affect the conclusion?

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂