To Immunize or Not to Immunize

Project description
After reading the scenario below, imagine that you are an expert in viruses, the immune system, and epidemics. As an expert you are asked to explain in language everyone can understand the scientific basis supporting one of the two positions below.
A new strain of avian bird virus has popped up in China and has health officials at the World Health Organization are worried. They fear it may jump across species and infect humans, causing a pandemic. The virus is 100% lethal in birds! killing them within 24 to 48 hours. A human vaccine against the avian virus has successfully been manufactured in the US and there is enough to inoculate the entire US population. You are a scientist at the Center for Disease Control and have been called before Congress where they are debating whether to make immunization so against the avian flu legally mandatory for all US citizens.
Ignoring the constitutionality of such law, choose one of the following positions and in writing, present a scientifically persuasive argument for why this is the case, please state what the alternative strategy should be.
Position 1. To prevent a lethal epidemic in the United States all those living in the US must receive the vaccine.
Position 2. One can protect the entire US population against an epidemic without having to vaccinate everyone.
I would like for you to take position one and write a persuasive essay.
Please use 3 references one is Tortora Funke & case eleventh edition 2013 the other two references s
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂