religious pluralism
choose one of them as a prompt of the paper. you dont have to answer both of them. please mention which one is answered in the paper. relate this paper with the reading I attached. that is the only source you need for this paper. Thank you.
1. Brubaker argues that “religious pluralism entails deeper and more divisive forms of diversity” (p.3) than linguistic pluralism, in part, because religious pluralism often leads to “deep conflicts of principle, involving fundamental differences of world view” (p.15). Do you agree with this portrayal of religion? In other words, do you agree that religion is often a divisive force in the political sphere? Why or why not?
2. Brubaker suggests that religion has become an increasingly private and subjective experience (p. 7), and that this has lead to increased religious pluralism. What, if any, impact do you expect the re-‘publicizing’ of religion have on acceptance of religious pluralism?
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Â
Â