Establishing the extent of creativity in everyday discourse is problematic. Ronald Carter sees it as a matter of degree; difficult both to define and to measure; pervasive rather than omnipresent, and variable to the point that he suggests the notion of plural creativities, (2004, pp.139,140). He argues that creativity is best understood by means of clines and with reference to social contexts (2004, p.54). This essay will draw primarily on Carters arguments, using them as a platform from which to explore creativity within an extract of authentic speech data (Appendix A). The aim is to identify forms, features and functions of creativity, and at the same time consider how contextual information can further our understanding. This should enable us to evaluate the level and range of linguistic creativity in this extract, and consider how far that evaluation is representa…(short extract)
