+1 862 207 3288 Ethics of Belief.
Compare and contrast the positions of W. Clifford and William James on
the question when can and should we accept something as true. Why does
Clifford think that it is always wrong to accept something on
insufficient evidence? What does he mean by ‘sufficient evidence’? How
come James argues that sometimes it is permissible to accept a belief
on non-intellectual, ‘passional’ grounds? What exactly does James say
about the religious beliefs?
